Skip to main content

Emma Rothschild. "The Inner Life of Empires: An Eighteenth-Century History."

Emma Rothschild, The Inner Life of Empires: An Eighteenth-Century History. (Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 2011.) 

By N. H. Gill

Emma Rothschild’s Inner Life of Empires presents a “large microhistory” of the Johnstone family, eleven children, their parents, and two of their slaves, who lived and moved within influential social and intellectual circles during the eighteenth century Scottish Enlightenment.[1] This prosopography traces the children’s lives across the British Empire as well as their friendships with philosophers – including David Hume, Adam Ferguson, and the early economist Adam Smith – to illustrate a world of laissez faire as it was lived and imagined at inception.

Rothschild describes her work as a history of “ideas and sentiments.”[2] She uses the first three chapters to describe the lives of the Johnstone siblings, from their initial ventures in the British East and West Indies, their economic and political cooperation, and the balance of their lives at their deaths. Rothschild highlights their persistent feelings of anxiety and impermanence, as well as the tragedies of the penultimate child’s death at eighteen in India and another son’s legal tribulations stemming from his participation in the culture of gift-giving as practiced in Bengali during the early years of the East India Company. The chapters are well-written and demonstrate the hyper-globalized world of this modest Scottish family. 

Chapter four examines developing theories of political economy, like Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations, emphasizing a social milieu in which the process of “imaging oneself in a world in which [modern economic] distinctions and definitions were themselves objects of anxious reflection.”[3] Chapter five is broad, exploring diverse topics from slavery and information networks to gender and familial intimacy. The following two chapters are where the choice to adopt a period writing style is felt the most. While this disturbs the flow of the text, the monograph makes interesting insights about the activities and outlooks of Enlightenment groups, such as booksellers, clerks, and clerics. 

Chapter seven focuses on sentiments and self-reflection while chapter eight returns to an analysis of the lives of two slaves immersed in the story of the Johnstone family: “Bell or Belinda” and Joseph Knight, whose cases, taken together, represent the legal turning point in the practice of slavery in the British Isles. Given the emphasis placed on the role these two people played in Rothschild’s history, more background on Bengalese and African slavery as it intersected with the Johnstones would have been appreciated. 

The rich description of how the agents of Britain’s vast commercial empire viewed themselves and their actions as members of the Enlightenment make Inner Life of Empires interesting to both European and global historians. Tapping archives on three continents, as well extensive use of family correspondence, Rothschild provides ample evidence of the social and economic conventions of an aspiring family of Scottish entrepreneurs.

*(Updated with edits: 11/11/17)

[1] Emma Rothschild, The Inner Life of Empires: An Eighteenth-Century History (Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 2011), 269.
[2] Ibid., 268.
[3] Ibid., 133.


Popular posts from this blog

"New" and "Old" Regionalism Theories

(Apr. 2, 2008) Regionalism studies are those studies that focus on the middle layer of governance, between the state and the global, that emerge out of concerted processes of regional integration like the EU, the Arab League, NAFTA, CARICOM, and ASEAN. The first two theoretical explanations of this process in South America that we will discuss are New and Old Regionalism. New Regionalism is an outgrowth of the process of globalization "based on the idea that one cannot isolate trade and economy from the rest of society…" The thesis that social development must accompany economic development for integration efforts to succeed stands in contrast to "Old" Regionalism, (also known as "first generation" regionalism, or "classic" regionalism) which was primarily seen as a process of economic integration. According to De Lombarede, this movement began to gather speed in the late 1980s and is associated with changes in Eastern Europe and the end of the …

Chilean Foreign Policy: 2008

What is Chile's current foreign policy?Chile's current foreign policy strongly resembles the foreign policy of the Portales period, emphasizing political neutrality, non-intervention, sovereign equality, regional stability, and commercial expansion. The types of problems it faces are also similar to that era, but not specific to it, insofar as it has yet to resolve territorial disputes with Argentina, Bolivia, and Peru.[1] However, its relative economic success and interest based diplomacy, as opposed to a variable ideology-driven policy like those of other nations around the region, have given Chile a position of power within the region disproportionate to its size and small population. Like Brazil, Chile's foreign policy can be divided between regional and extra-regional efforts, [2] but it can also be further subdivided between its commercial and political agenda, with its extra-regional efforts focused primarily on commerce while the principle aim of its regional effor…

Historiography: Economic Explanations of South American Integration

(Mar. 29, 2008) There are several ways of approaching the question of South American integration; depending on which facet of society you choose to analyze you get a different answer. The most popular explanations are economic, historical/cultural, and Brazilian.The emphasis on economic explanations is succinctly explained by Vanden and Prevost who note, "In Latin America one cannot fully understand the political game without understanding its economic underpinnings."1 because of the strong influence of the Marxist school of structuralism economic explanations tend to focus on the region's dependent peripheral commercial status.2Cultural explanations highlight the similarities that exist between the nations of South America, emphasizing the shared history of European colonialism and the similar historical challenges faced by many nations in the region.3Finally, by "Brazilian" we mean those theories that view the current integration movement as an extension of B…