Skip to main content

Historiography: Brazilian Hegemony in South America

(Mar. 31, 2008) The last explanation we will analyze here is what we are referring to as the "Brazilian hegemonic" explanation. This position holds that Brazil, given the much larger size of its population, economy, and territory relative to the rest of the region, is the natural hegemon in South American regional affairs.[1] This position also maintains that UNASUR is a Brazilian initiative to more effectively allow it to promote its interests abroad. [2] [3] [4] The first part of this claim rests on the undisputed size of all things Brazilian while the second highlights the protagonistic role of Brazilian foreign policy in the late 1990s and into the present century.

From a socio-economic point of view, Brazil represents about half of South America. To list some of its superlatives, the country itself is slightly smaller than the U.S., occupying roughly 50 percent of the continent; it is the home of more than half of the population and produces slightly less than half the total gross domestic product (GDP) of South America. [5] Internationally Brazil is also a global power. It is one of the ten largest economies in the world, and has served on the UN Security council as a non permanent member more than any other country except Japan. [6] These figures help give an idea of the international importance of Brazil as a nation, as well as the basis for those explanations that highlight the leading role of Brazil in the international system within South America.

Supporters of the explanation of Brazil's hegemonic role in the formation of UNASUR highlight the influential role played by Brazil during the late 1990s leading up to the Summit of Brasilia, convoked by then President Cardoso in 2000, and the first Summit of Heads of State of the South American Community of Nations (CSN), again hosted in Brasilia in 2005. These two meetings helped lay the foundations for the current process of integration. Brazil's official foreign policy recognizes the strategic advantage the leadership role in South America gives Brazil by saying that "Brazil's position as a global actor is fully consistent with the emphasis that we put on regional integration, and vice versa. In fact, our capacity to peacefully coexist with our neighbors, while contributing to the development of the region is a significant factor that underlies our international role." [7] And in an Economist article in 2004 Celso Amorim, the current foreign minister said, "in a world likely to be dominated by blocks, Brazil's best option is to co-operate as much as possible with its neighbors…" [8] This opinion runs counter to conventional wisdom that holds that large nations have more to lose by entering regional unions with smaller countries. [9] In the case of Brazil this is due to a strong history of diplomatic multilateralism that will be discussed further in the section on Brazilian foreign policy goals.

By Nathan Gill - Southern Affairs

[1] Ribando 2007:9. [2] Carrión, Francisco. Personal Interview. Quito, Ecuador 28 Jan. 2008. [3] Ortiz, Benjamín. Personal interview. Quito, Ecuador. 5 Feb. 2008. [4] Ribadeneira, Diego. Personal interview. Lima, Perú. 29 Feb. 2008. [5] IMF World Economic Outlook Database 2006. CEPAL 2006. [6] Amorim 2007 [7] Ibid [8] "A Giant Stirs." The Economist. 10 Jun. 2004. 28 Mar. 2008 [9] "Geopolitical Diary: The Obstacles to Latin America's UNASUR" Strategic Forecasting. 24 Apr. 2007. n. pag. Online. 28 Mar. 2008


  1. Congratulations, you did a very good work here indeed. It's nice to see the website is now too, easy to type. =)

    -J from Brazil


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Moving to the Suburbs: Reducciones in Recent Latin American Historiography

In 1503, the Spanish monarchy issued its first decree for the resettlement of indigenous groups in the Caribbean so that they would “live together” and “not remain or wander separated from each other in the backcountry.”[1]

As the European conquest spread to North, Central, and South America, these new settlements – known as reducciones and congregaciones in Spanish and descimentos in Portuguese – became sites of forced labor, evangelism, experimental agricultural, and refuge. Through a series of imperial policies decreed over the next decades and centuries of colonial rule, Spanish and Portuguese officials attempted to reshape the New World, including its human and natural landscapes. How colonial historians explain this process and indigenous peoples’ reactions to it is the focus of this essay.

In a review of the recent historiography of reducciones, several trends emerge that signal a shift in our understanding of the practice. As this paper will show, one common element is that …

"Open" and "Closed" Regionalism Theories

(Apr. 3, 2008) The terms "Open" and "closed" regionalism refer to the degree in which regional blocks allow nonmember nations to access their markets. In this sense, an "open region" is one with few, if any, external trade restrictions while a "closed region" can be defined as one whose external trade policies seek to restrict commerce with nations outside the region.Closed regionalism as practiced in Latin America grew out of the policy suggestions made by UN ECLAC/CEPAL school of dependency theory in the early 1960s. As discussed earlier, proponents of this policy argued that states should form regional alliances with a series of trade barriers against foreign products to foment regional industrialization and assure captive local markets for these manufactured goods. The failure of this system of integration to meet Latin America's economic goals became apparent during the 1980s and was further highlighted by the strong economic performanc…

Greetings From Gringolandia

Bloomberg Businessweek, March 28 — April 3, 2016
Susan Lamy and her husband, Jean Pierre, owned a successful interior design business in Westport, Conn., but they still worried about how they would make ends meet in retirement. “Just paying for the basic necessities was killing us, and we could see that there was no way that we would ever be able to stop working,” says Lamy. 
The search for an affordable retirement spot led the couple to Cuenca, a Unesco World Heritage site in Ecuador’s southern Andes. They settled there in 2013 and now live in a spacious apartment with a terrace overlooking the Yanuncay River. Lamy says she and her husband enjoy a high standard of living in Cuenca for around $2,500 a month, paid for by their Social Security checks: “This seemed to be the best possibility for having a really terrific life on a fixed income.” 
The combination of a subtropical climate, well-preserved colonial architecture, and low cost of living has made Cuenca a magnet for North Ameri…